News & Insights

We’re Making History in Real Time.

Our timely insights share informed perspectives on the rapidly evolving story of Election Technology, as it unfolds.

Who Should Make an Elections AI Service Agent? (Part 6)

Who Should Make an Elections AI Service Agent? (Part 6)

In this final installment of how to build an NLA (a domain-specific or DS-NLA) — the how informing the who question (that we started with back in mid-Dec ‘23) — I focus on what may be the most overlooked set of questions about how a system should be built — not just for serving users, but supporting it’s operators…

Read More
Who Should Make an Elections AI Service Agent? (Part 5)

Who Should Make an Elections AI Service Agent? (Part 5)

In the previous (4th) installment in this series, we pivoted from the question of who can or should build Chatbots, to the challenge of How to build a safe, low-tolerance, domain-specific natural language agent (NLA or “DS-NLA”). This time, we assume for the moment that challenge is tractable and explore the question, “What else is required, in addition to a safe base model?”…

Read More
Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot? (Part 4)

Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot? (Part 4)

After an extended holiday break from my last installment on the question: “Who should make a Chatbot for voters?” — I’m back for the 4th installment in this series. This time, I’m pivoting from the Who question to the How question; and I have definitely pivoted from “Chatbot” to “domain-specific natural language agent” (NLA)…

Read More
Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot? (Part 3)
Commentary, Research & Development John Sebes Commentary, Research & Development John Sebes

Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot? (Part 3)

After two installments on the question: “Who should make a Chatbot for voters?” — we’ve come down to 3 observations:

  1. Elections is an area of very low tolerance for inaccuracies, hallucinations, and repeating falsehoods.

  2. It’s a terrible idea to build a so-called “lightweight Chatbot” app on top of the existing services powered by current LLMs from the AI tech-titans.

  3. It’s not a good idea for any of those tech-titans to use their expertise and resources to tinker with their own LLM to be a specialized info service.

So then, given what needs to be built, we can finally consider who in the hec can (or should)…

Read More
Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot? (Part 2)
Commentary, Research & Development John Sebes Commentary, Research & Development John Sebes

Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot? (Part 2)

In the previous installment of this series, I gave a simple answer of “Nobody!” to the question of who should build a voter Chatbot. The reason was simple: the typical Chatbot is equally simple — and fatally flawed: a thin veneer of web (or App) user interface on top of an application programming interface (API) that connects over the Internet to a massive computing complex run by tech titans. and that’s only the beginning of the challenges…

Read More
Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot?
Commentary, Research & Development John Sebes Commentary, Research & Development John Sebes

Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot?

One of the side effects of the AI frenzy this past year is that lots of people are talking about the idea of having an AI-powered ChatBot for their favorite thing. Election-land is not immune to this desire. Like everywhere else, the idea is more-or-less similar: “Wouldn’t it be great if we could wave a magic wand and have an Oracle appear that is safe and reliable to answer any question about my favorite topic?” Well as the old saying goes, “Not so fast there, my friend”…

Read More